Anatomical guidelines for miniscrew insertion: palatal sites.

نویسندگان

  • Björn Ludwig
  • Bettina Glasl
  • S Jay Bowman
  • Benedict Wilmes
  • Gero S M Kinzinger
  • Jörg A Lisson
چکیده

A previous Overview described suitable sites for vestibular miniscrew insertion.1 Although these locations are commonly used in orthodontic applications because of their ease of access, the interradicular spaces are limited by the proximity of neighboring roots (Fig. 1), presenting the following problems: • Risk of damaging the roots or the periodontium. • Possibility of miniscrew-root contact resulting in early screw failure. • Risk of screw fracture during placement, due to the narrower miniscrew dimensions needed for interradicular positions. • A loss rate as high as 25%.2 These risk factors can be avoided by using “rootless areas” such as the hard palate, the maxillary tuberosity, or the portions of the zygomatic arches adjacent to the maxilla. The tuberosity cannot be regarded as entirely safe, since unerupted third molars or thick layers of gingiva may prevent successful insertion3 (Fig. 2). Insertion into the inferior portion of the zygomatic arch carries the risk of perforating the maxillary sinus.4 Therefore, the only safe alternatives to buccal miniscrew placement are in the palate. In the mandible, where lingual screw insertion is associated with higher loss rates,5 the mentalis region is better suited for miniscrews and miniplates.6 In the maxilla, the hard palate appears to be an ideal insertion site. While the anterior palate definitely offers sufficient bone, consensus has yet to be reached regarding the minimal amount of bone required to avoid penetration into neighboring anatomical structures. Liou and colleagues suggested 2mm,7 Poggio and colleagues

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Optimal palatal configuration for miniscrew applications.

OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that palatal bone is not able to support titanium miniscrews (11 mm in length and 2 mm in diameter) when subjected to forces normally generated during orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS The miniscrew-palatal bone system was modeled and analyzed using the commercial finite element method software ANSYS Multiphysics 10.0; tests were done in both a stat...

متن کامل

Clinical applications of the Mini-Screw-Anchorage-System (M.A.S.) in the maxillary alveolar bone.

AIMS anchorage control with self-tapping screws has become an important part of the clinical management of the orthodontic patients. Mechanical resistance and sites of insertion of miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage are critical to ensure successful outcomes. Aim of this clinical study was threefold: 1) to measure the mechanical resistance of the M.A.S., 2) to evaluate if the alveolar areas us...

متن کامل

Quantitative evaluation with CBCT of palatal bone thickness in growing patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the most suitable region of the palate for the insertion of miniscrews. We analysed 4 different paracoronal sections of Digital Volumetric Tomographies of 52 patients with ages ranging between 10 and 15 years and measured the thickness of the palatine bone in 20 different sites. For each section we measured the height of the palatal bone at 0, 3 and 6 m...

متن کامل

Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary anterior alveolar bone for optimal placement of miniscrew implants

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to propose clinical guidelines for placing miniscrew implants using the results obtained from 3-dimensional analysis of maxillary anterior interdental alveolar bone by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS By using CBCT data from 52 adult patients (17 men and 35 women; mean age, 27.9 years), alveolar bone were measured in 3 regions: between the maxillary cen...

متن کامل

Is the Palate an Optimal Site for Miniscrew Placement?

To test the hypothesis that palatal bone is able to support miniscrews when subjected to forces generatedduring orthodontic treatment. Finite element method software ANSYS10.0 was used. Tests were done in a state of osseointegration and non osseointegration. Two different palatal regions i.e. one layer of cortical bone and underlying trabecular bone; & two layers of cortical bone with trabecula...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO

دوره 45 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011